I think the overall argument is for gay marriage to be legalized. “Civil unions” include heterosexual couples, so providing the images of same-sex couples helps to identify the argument for gay marriage in particular. I also liked the sign on the back of the car—it’s awkward, unwieldy, and unromantic. That in itself argues that civil unions are not enough for people who want marriage. The dog comic at the end, to me, makes an argument for progress. He’s sitting in a room that’s on fire and ironically saying it’s fine, when clearly a change needs to be made.
Lol that “This is fine.” comic is one of my favorite things out there right now. This, visually, seems to speak against the idea that a ‘civil union’ should be good enough for gay and lesbian couples. Many have accepted this route thusfar, but they end up like the largest image on the bottom- sitting in a personal hell of unrest and trying to tell themselves that being ‘close enough’ is just fine. Can’t wait to see your reflection!
Ashley and Charlie – Yep, you both figured out my argument! I knew I had to work the “This is fine.” comic into this somehow. As per Dr. Romberger’s instructions, I do believe that visual arguments are possible. Even though all three images with people or personified figures (i.e. the dog) are different, their existence in the same space (designated for an argument) means that they function together. I believe people would still be able to understand the argument, even if I’d posted this on Facebook, Twitter, etc., without any particular context or anchoring text. As for strictness of argument, I believe that we have to understand the visual as making a point beyond itself.
I also am not impressed by those sad statistics showcased on your second visual. I think your choice to couple it with Bey is really insightful because her eye roll encapsulates the frustration of many people of color when it comes to gaining recognition for meaningful work. The use of Beyonce is also powerful because here is a Black woman at the top of her profession who continues to be affected by the diversity gap in the entertainment world.
Exactly. If we’re looking at pure vocal ability among contemporary artists, Beyonce is in a league of her own. Then there’s that recent Grammy ceremony… while I’m not a huge fan of Beyonce’s self-titled album (aside from a few songs like “Partition”), she was highly expected to win, she’s a phenomenal performer, and she’s more than paid her dues in the industry; it would have been nice to see her finally win Album of the Year.
I think the overall argument is for gay marriage to be legalized. “Civil unions” include heterosexual couples, so providing the images of same-sex couples helps to identify the argument for gay marriage in particular. I also liked the sign on the back of the car—it’s awkward, unwieldy, and unromantic. That in itself argues that civil unions are not enough for people who want marriage. The dog comic at the end, to me, makes an argument for progress. He’s sitting in a room that’s on fire and ironically saying it’s fine, when clearly a change needs to be made.
Lol that “This is fine.” comic is one of my favorite things out there right now. This, visually, seems to speak against the idea that a ‘civil union’ should be good enough for gay and lesbian couples. Many have accepted this route thusfar, but they end up like the largest image on the bottom- sitting in a personal hell of unrest and trying to tell themselves that being ‘close enough’ is just fine. Can’t wait to see your reflection!
Ashley and Charlie – Yep, you both figured out my argument! I knew I had to work the “This is fine.” comic into this somehow. As per Dr. Romberger’s instructions, I do believe that visual arguments are possible. Even though all three images with people or personified figures (i.e. the dog) are different, their existence in the same space (designated for an argument) means that they function together. I believe people would still be able to understand the argument, even if I’d posted this on Facebook, Twitter, etc., without any particular context or anchoring text. As for strictness of argument, I believe that we have to understand the visual as making a point beyond itself.
I also am not impressed by those sad statistics showcased on your second visual. I think your choice to couple it with Bey is really insightful because her eye roll encapsulates the frustration of many people of color when it comes to gaining recognition for meaningful work. The use of Beyonce is also powerful because here is a Black woman at the top of her profession who continues to be affected by the diversity gap in the entertainment world.
Exactly. If we’re looking at pure vocal ability among contemporary artists, Beyonce is in a league of her own. Then there’s that recent Grammy ceremony… while I’m not a huge fan of Beyonce’s self-titled album (aside from a few songs like “Partition”), she was highly expected to win, she’s a phenomenal performer, and she’s more than paid her dues in the industry; it would have been nice to see her finally win Album of the Year.